Design and technological appropriateness: The quest for community survivability
2014 • C.P.M. Sianipar, G. Yudoko, K. Dowaki and A. Adhiutama
Abstract. The extent of exposure to which a societal group is possible to fall into a critical condition or crisis is defined as the vulnerabilities embedded in the group. Vulnerability eradication is then characterized as having particularities in each circumstance. The eradication effort addressed to a vulnerable community with situational limitations is becoming interesting to study. Technology, as an interdisciplinary solution, is potential to be a powerful solution for the eradication. Although vulnerability eradication has been widely discussed, the discussion is rather fragmented that compiled in historical way. This study aims to analyze the quest of community survivability through technological appropriateness and design. Information are gathered from literature to be properly ordered based on the position of each phenomenon in history. Facts are compared and contrasted to deliver clear understandings on the chronologies. The historical explanations indicate that the pursuit of technological appropriateness was tightly related to the rising of technological independence in Southern hemisphere. Also, design methodologies were developed to address challenges in each own time frame, yet each one has its own benefits and disadvantages; hence engineers need to carefully choose appropriate methodology to produce an “appropriate” technology. Then, this study gives a notion that the quest is still waiting to have further development of design methodologies for AT.
MLA Style Manual (Modern Language Association)
- Sianipar, Corinthias P. M., et al. “Design and technological appropriateness: The quest for community survivability.” Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 9.1 (2014): 1-17.
APA Citation Format
- Sianipar, C. P. M., Yudoko, G., Dowaki, K., & Adhiutama, A. (2014). Design and technological appropriateness: The quest for community survivability. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 9(1), 1-17.
CMOS (Chicago Manual of Style)
- Sianipar, Corinthias P. M., Gatot Yudoko, Kiyoshi Dowaki, and Akbar Adhiutama. “Design and technological appropriateness: The quest for community survivability.” Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 9, no. 1 (2014): 1-17.
- Akubue, A. (2000). Appropriate technology for socioeconomic development in Third-World countries. Journal of Technology Studies, 26(1).
- Amstrong, T. (1997). Design for Sustainability. Toronto, CA: IndEco Strategic Consulting.
- Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research. Design Issues, 20(1): 16-29.
- Betz, M.J., McGowan, P., & Wigand, R.T. (Eds.). (1984). Appropriate technology: Choices and development. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
- Bhagavan, M. (1979). A critique of ‘appropriate’ technology for underdeveloped countries. Research Report 48. Uppsala, SE: The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.
- Boom, S. (2005). Affordable lightning for people living in rural areas of Cambodia: Design of a solar lantern for the Cambodian market. Delft, NL: TU Delft.
- Bourdelais, P. (2005). What is vulnerability? Annales de Démographie Historique, 110(2): 11-15.
- Bourrieres, P. (1979). Adaptation of technologies to available resources. In: A. Robinson (Ed.), Appropriate technologies for Third World development (pp. 1-7). New York, US: St. Martin’s Press.
- Brezet, H., & Hemel, C. v. (1997). Ecodesign: A promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. Paris, FR: Renouf Publishing.
- Brooks, H. (1980). A critique of the concept of appropriate technology. In: F. Long and A. Oleson (Eds.), Appropriate technology and social values: A critical appraisal (pp. 53-78). Cambridge, US: Ballinger.
- Carley, M., & Christie, I. (1993). Managing sustainable development. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press.
- Clark, G., Kosoris, J., Hong, L. N., & Crul, M. (2009). Design for Sustainability: Current trends in sustainable product design and development. Sustainability, 1(1): 409-424.
- Cross, N. (Ed.). (1984). Developments in design methodology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
- Crul, M. (2003). Ecodesign in Central America. Delft, NL: TU Delft Design for Sustainability Publications.
- Comfort, L., Wisner, B., Cutter, S., Pulwarty, R., Hewitt, K., Oliver-Smith, A., & Krimgold, F. (1999). Reframing disaster policy: The global evolution of vulnerable communities. Environmental Hazards, 1(1): 39-44.
- Cummings, S. L. (2001). Community economic development as progressive politics: Toward a grassroots movement for economic justice. Stanford Law Review, 54: 399-493.
- Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., & Shirley, W.L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2): 242-261.
- Darrow, K., & Saxenian, M. (1986). Appropriate technology sourcebook: A guide to practical books for village and small community technology. Stanford, US: Volunteers in Asia.
- Díaz-Puente, J. M., Montero, A. C., & De los Ríos Carmenado, I. (2009). Empowering communities through evaluation: Some lessons from rural Spain. Community Development Journal, 44(1): 53-67.
- Diehl, J., & Kuipers, H. (2008). Design for the base of the pyramid: Student field projects in Cambodia. Proceedings of DesignED Asia Conference in Hong Kong, CN, 2008.
- Dunn, P. D. (1978). Appropriate technology: Technology with a human face. New York, US: Schoken Books.
- Edoho, F. M. (2009). Appropriate technology transfer. Institutional Issues Involving Ethics and Justice, 2: 123-136.
- Eisenman, D.P., Cordasco, K.M., Asch, S., Golden, J.F., & Glik, D. (2007). Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. American Journal of Public Health, 97(Supplement 1): S109-S115.
- Evrard, D., Mathieux, F., & Wood, D. (2009). Sustainability and adapted product Eco-Design in small islands developing states in the South Pacific: Teachings of the first case Study in Fiji. Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Science International-Congress in Tahiti, PF, 2009.
- Feinblatt, E. (2013). Update. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/sG4ovp on 6 November, 2013.
- Ferguson, L. J. (2010). Transformational empowerment: Change your world from the inside out. Interbeing, 4(2): 35-37.
- Few, R. (2003). Flooding, vulnerability and coping strategies: local responses to a global threat. Progress in Development Studies, 3(1): 43-58.
- Fiksel, J. (ed.) (1996). Design for Environment. US: McGraw-Hill.
- Fritsch, A., & Gallimore, P. (2007). Healing Appalachia: Sustainable living through appropriate technology. Kentucky, US: The University Press of Kentucky.
- Ganguly, D., & Docker, J. (2007). Rethinking Gandhi and nonviolent relationality: Global perspectives. New York, US: Routledge.
- Garniati, L., Owen, A., Kruijsen, J., Ishadamy, Y., & Wibisono, I. (2013). Interface between appropriate technology and sustainable energy policy in vulnerable societies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 12: 9-15.
- Goodier, R., & Moseson, A. (2013). Communities move to the center of the design process in a newly proposed methodology. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/Wm1SX2 on 2 October, 2013.
- Haffmans, S., & Winthagen, V. (2009). Final report: Cleaner production for better products case studies. Amsterdam, NL: IdealCo.
- Harrison, P. (1980). The Third-World tomorrow. London, UK: Penguin Books.
- Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L. H. (1999). Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Massachusetts, US: Little Brown and Company.
- Hazeltine, B., & Bull, C. (1999). Appropriate technology: Tools, choices, and implications. California, US: Academic Press.
- James, J. (2014). Is there a renewed role for Appropriate Technology in the new global innovation system? Journal of International Development, doi: 10.1002/jid.2986
- Jequier, N., & Blanc, G. (1983). The world of appropriate technology. Paris, FR: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
- Kaplinsky, R. (1990). The economies of small: Appropriate technology in a changing world. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.
- Kaplinsky, R. (2011). Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy, 40: 193-203.
- Lacy, W. B. (2000). Empowering communities through public work, science, and local food systems: Revisiting democracy and globalization. Rural Sociology, 65(1): 3-26.
- Lee, K-H. (2009). Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations? Management Decision, 47(7): 1101-1121.
- Leichenko, R. M., & O’Brien, K. L. (2002). The dynamics of rural vulnerability to global change: The case of Southern Africa. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7(1): 1-18.
- Lin, J. Y., & Zhang, P. (2009). Industrial structure, appropriate technology and economic growth in less developed countries. Policy Research Working Paper 4905. Washington DC, US: The World Bank Development Economics Vice Presidency.
- Lucena, J., Schneider, J., & Leydens, J. A. (2010). Engineering and sustainable community development. California, US: Morgan & Claypool.
- Mechanic, D., & Tanner, J. (2007). Vulnerable people, groups, and populations: Societal view. Health Affairs, 26(5): 1220-1230.
- Mitchell, T. (1988). Colonising Egypt. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Moore, C. (1994). Images of development: Egyptian engineers in search of industry. Cairo, EG: The American University of Cairo Press.
- Morawetz, D. (1974). Employment implications of industrialization in developing countries: A survey. The Economic Journal, 84(335): 491-542.
- Narayana, N. (2003). Making technologies work for the poor in developing countries. Botswana Journal of African Studies, 17(2): 26-34.
- Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K-H. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach (3rd ed.). Berlin, DE: Springer.
- Pearson, J. (2006). Design and sustainability: Opportunities for systemic transformation. Virginia, US: GreenBlue.
- Pellegrini, U. (1979). The problem of appropriate technology. In A. de Giorgio and C. Roveda (Eds.), Criteria for selecting appropriate technologies under different cultural, technical and social conditions (pp. 1-5). New York, US: Pergamon Press.
- Pursell, C. (1993). The rise and fall of the appropriate technology movement in the United States: 1965-1985. Technology and Culture, 34(3): 629-637.
- Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and social justice. California, US: Morgan & Claypool.
- Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological Change. In: S. Rayner & L. Malone (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change (vol. 2: Resources and Technology, pp. 327-399). Washington D.C., US: Batelle Press.
- Rist, G. (2002). The history of development from Western origins to global faith. London, UK: Zed Books.
- Rosenbrock, H. (1979). The redirection of technology. In A. de Giorgio A and C. Roveda (Eds.), Criteria for selecting appropriate technologies under different cultural, technical and social conditions (pp. 7-3). New York, US: Pergamon Press.
- Rybczynski, W. (1982). Paper heroes: A review of appropriate technology. Chain Reaction, (27): 38-39.
- Sampat, P. (1995). India’s low-tech energy success. World Watch, 8(6): 21-23.
- Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. Virginia, US: Hartley & Marks Publishers.
- Sclove, R. (1995). Democracy and Technology. New York, US: The Guilford Press.
- Teitel, S. (1978). On the concept of appropriate technology for less industrialized countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 11(4): 349-369.
- Thormann, P. (1979). Proposal for a program in appropriate technology. In A. Robinson (Ed.), Appropriate technologies for Third World development (pp. 280-299). New York, US: St. Martin’s Press.
- Todaro, M. P. (1997). Urbanization, unemployment, and migration in Africa: Theory and policy. Policy Research Division Working Papers, 104: 1-50. New York, US: Population Council.
- Turner, B.L., Kasperson, R.E., Matson, P.A., McCarthy, J.J., Corell, R.W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J.X., Luers, A., Martello, M.L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., & Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14): 8074-8079.
- Wajcman, J. (1995). ‘Feminist Perspectives on Technology’, in Teich A (Ed.), Technology and the Future (7th eds.), ch. 18, pp. 67-79. California, US: Thomson Wadsworth.
- Walker, S. (2002). A journey in design: An exploration of perspectives for sustainability. Journal Sustainable Product Design, 2(1-2): 3-10.
- Wicklein, R. C. (1998). Designing for appropriate technology in developing countries. Technology in Society, 20(3): 371-375.
- Willoughby, K. W. (1990). Technology choice: A critique of the appropriate technology movement. Colorado, US: Westview Press.
- Wilson, P. A. (1996). Empowerment: Community economic development from the inside out. Urban Studies, 33(4-5): 617-630.
- Yanful, E. K. (2009). Appropriate technologies for environmental protection in the developing world. Dordrecht: NL: Springer.
- Young, G. (2010). Design thinking and sustainability. Sydney, AU: Zumio.
- Sianipar, C.P.M., K. Dowaki, & Yudoko, G. (2014). Technological solution for vulnerable communities: How does its approach matter? IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 58, 012022.
- Sianipar, C. P. M., Yudoko, G., & Dowaki, K. (2014). Materials research in Appropriate Technology: In the midst of science, engineering, and technology. Key Engineering Materials, 594, 334-338.
- Sianipar, C. P., Yudoko, G., & Dowaki, K. (2014). Physiological concept: Visible modeling for feasible design. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 439, 432-437.
- Sianipar, C. P., Yudoko, G., Dowaki, K., & Adhiutama, A. (2013). Design methodology for appropriate technology: Engineering as if people mattered. Sustainability, 5(8), 3382-3425.
- Sianipar, C. P. M., Dowaki, K., Yudoko, G., & Adhiutama, A. (2013). Seven pillars of survivability: Appropriate technology with a human face. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(4), 1-18.
- Sianipar, C. P., Taufiq, H., Estiningtyas, H. R., Dowaki, K., Adhiutama, A., & Yudoko, G. (2013). Materials selection in Appropriate Technology: Four focuses in design thinking. Advanced Materials Research, 789, 379-382.
- Sianipar, C. P. M., Yudoko, G., Adhiutama, A., & Dowaki, K. (2013). Community empowerment through appropriate technology: Sustaining the sustainable development. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 17, 1007-1016.